➵ [Read] ➱ Storia delle terre e dei luoghi leggendari By Umberto Eco ➿ – Golanvideoagency.info
A Fascinating Illustrated Tour Of The Fabled Places In Literature And Folklore That Have Awed, Troubled, And Eluded Us Through The Ages From The Epic Poets Of Antiquity To Contemporary Writers Of Science Fiction, From The Authors Of The Holy Scriptures To Modern Raconteurs Of Fairy Tales, Writers And Storytellers Through The Ages Have Invented Imaginary And Mythical Lands, Projecting Onto Them All Of Our Human Dreams, Ideals, And Fears In The Tradition Of His Acclaimed History Of Beauty, On Ugliness, And The Infinity Of Lists, Renowned Writer And Cultural Critic Umberto Eco Leads Us On A Beautifully Illustrated Journey Through These Lands Of Myth And Invention, Showing Us Their Inhabitants, The Passions That Rule Them, Their Heroes And Antagonists, And, Above All, The Importance They Hold For Us He Explores This Human Urge To Create Such Places, The Utopias And Dystopias Where Our Imagination Can Confront Things That Are Too Incredible Or Challenging For Our Limited Real World Illuminated With ThanColor Images, The Book Of Legendary Lands Is Both Erudite And Thoroughly Enjoyable, Bringing Together Disparate Elements Of Our Shared Literary Legacy In A Way Only Umberto Eco Can Homer S Poems And Other Ancient And Medieval Texts Are Presented Side By Side With Gulliver S Travels And Alice In Wonderland Tolkien Shares Space With Marco Polo S Books Of The Marvels Of The World Films Complement Poems, And Comics Inform Novels Together, These Stories Have Influenced The Sensibilities And Worldview Of All Of Us I was expecting somethinglike On Beauty, but it s nowhere near as considered or insightful Littlethan a brief overview of the key texts from a number of legends followed by excerpts from those texts, which just demonstrate that the overviews were accurate.There s little broader context given, and no real attempt to analyse the meanings of these legends Nor is there any attempt to be comprehensive An odd book, andthan a touch disappointing Nice pictures, though, and readable I was just expecting something . i love travelling to real and imaginative places the real nice thing is when you mix the two you travel to a spot and you find out that you got to paradise on earth or to the land of the Bible Eco does it beautifully and the book is a great joy.i have it in the Hebrew translation i guess there is one in English as well Where this is brilliant is as an art history book, giving the context for a huge variety of works maps lots of luscious yummy maps , paintings, illuminated and illustrated manuscripts, decorative art works, etc If I was richer I d buy a copy to keep just for the maps The book has a lovely heft, and I like it very much as a physical object The writing is exceptionally well referenced Each section finishes with a selection of original texts So, I guess, It s Eco s writing where I felt let down by the book His sections seemed to merely summarize what the original sources then discuss I wasn t sure why his sections were included, tbh what was the overarching point Someone else commented that it s weaker in this regard than History of Beauty On Ugliness, and I definitely agree The book might have been stronger if the original sections had been left to speak for themselves Ugh, Brain Pickings has a bunch of pages from this, and it makes me want it even . This one I mark read as I went through it, but like books of its type, it is not one to ever finish reading as you can always find something new and interesting in it I really liked this book It wasn t what I was expecting, though For some reason I expected it to be about literary lands the misunderstanding is my fault because I briefly heard of it and decided to read it without even reading the description It is actually about various lands that aren t real, but that people have really searched for Like Atlantis.It is fascinating, and full of interesting facts that I kept reading aloud to Joel It also ends with a wonderful chapter discussing how these sort of legendary lands differ from the fictional lands in books Well worth the time. A beautiful, inspiring and also sophisticated book Umberto Eco managed to write a book which is fully equal to similar already existing works such as The Atlas of Legendary Lands or Lost Lands, Forgotten Realms Very convincing the selection of images There are several we did not know, yet From an aesthetic point of view a really beautiful book And very convincing, too, the textual elaboration On the basis of Atlantis for example we see clearly that Umberto Eco did not just copy what others repeated already a thousand times Rather did Umberto Eco find even in this controversial issue his own convincing path.In detail on this example For Eco, the history of the various Atlantis localizations is not as so often a menacing climax with National Socialism as culmination wagging forefinger It is rather a journey through history with National Socialism as one stop of several Olof Rudbeck, too, is no crackpot baroque Nazi for Eco but a serious baroque scholar, who just erred Someone like Umberto Eco knows how to place these things properly, of course In the video for the book the connection of Hyperborea astonishingly not Atlantis to the Holocaust is drawn too closely as if someone who reads and thinks about the ancient Hyperborea resp Atlantis would become a National Socialist well, it is only the video, therefore let s forget it Let us leave the vexed and vain NS topic and come to Atlantis itself Already in his Foucault s Pendulum Eco was pleasently reserved concerning Atlantis this applies here, too The Atlantis map of the baroque scholar Athanasius Kircher is called correctly a map of the site of Atlantis, not as a map which allegedly displays the exact shape of Atlantis Also does Umberto Eco not repeat the terrible tale that Aristotle allegedly considered Plato s Atlantis explicitly to be an invention cf on the clarification of this common misconception Franke Aristotle and Atlantis, 2012 Also muchlearned than the usual nonsense is Eco s opinion that assertions of the truth of a story since Lucian s True History sound like an indicator for a fictional story this is well said Since Lucian, but not yet in Plato s time Conclusion As we can see with the Atlantis example, real quality is offered to the reader This is not just a copy paste collage labelled with Umberto Eco , but this is really the polymath Umberto Eco himself who presents to the great pleasure of the reader the colourful variety of his knowledge about various legendary places in word and picture. Eco writes in the introduction Legendary lands and places are of various kinds and have only one characteristic in common whether they depend on ancient legends whose origins are lost in the mists of time or whether they are an effect of a modern invention, they have created flows of belief The reality of these illusions is the subject of this book.Saint Sever World Map, from the Saint Sever Beatus, 1086T and O map, Bartholomaeus Angelicus, Le livre des propri t s des choses, 1392Map of Palmanova, from Franz Hogenberg and Georg Braun, Civitates orbis terrarum, 1572 1616 Thoroughly documented, it has a lot of facts and dates, not to mention the multitude of quotes from different other authors, in regard to each particular place And it has a lot of illustrations famous paintings, ancient maps, etc which, for me, were the best part of the book Overall, quite interesting but no so captivating.The edition is exquisite hardcover, glossy pages, colored illustrations a small and heavy jewel I love Umberto Eco s fiction This is not that This is part encyclopedia, part coffee table art book It did not entice me into reading it all the way through, though I was entertained by skimming It catalogs lands and places of legend, lifting out the passages that describe them in myths and older texts, and illustrating them with the paintings they ve inspired It s beautiful and interesting Not something I need to own, but definitely something that I ll need to read again if I ever write something set in one of those mythic lands Also, now I know that Columbus believed that the world was shaped like a pear, or like a round ball with a woman s teat on it, with the Terrestrial Paradise being located at the summit of that place that resembles the nipple of the pear So there s that.