[Reading] ➹ No Go The Bogeyman: Scaring, Lulling, and Making Mock By Marina Warner – Golanvideoagency.info
No Go The Bogeyman Considers The Enduring Presence And Popularity Of Figures Of Male Terror, Establishing Their Origins In Mythology And Their Current Relation To Ideas About Sexuality And Power, Youth And Age Songs, Stories, Images, And Films About Frightening Monsters Have Always Been Invented To Allay The Very Terrors That Our Sleep Of Reason Conjures Up Warner Shows How These Images And Stories, While They May Unfold Along Different Lines Scaring, Lulling, Or Making Mock Have The Strategic Simultaneous Purpose Of Both Arousing And Controlling The Underlying Fear In Analysis Of Material Long Overlooked By Cultural Critics, Historians, And Even Psychologists, Warner Revises Our Understanding Of Storytelling In Our Contemporary Culture She Asks Us To Reconsider The Unintended Consequences Of Our Age Old, Outmoded Notions About Masculine Identity And About Racial Stereotyping, And Warns Us Of The Dangerous, Unthinking Ways We Perpetuate The Bogeyman Took me some time to finish this book Apparently while I love fairy tales and learning about them I have significantly less attachment to the monsters of storytelling There is a lot of good information in this book and I particularly liked the making mock section Warners thoughts on fear and the varied human reactions to it were thought provoking I learned a great deal and am glad I read it. A great look at the things that go bump, and the way these primal fears are dealt with in story, song, and rhyme There s a great section that deals almost entirely with the imagery of eating and stories of cannibalism From there, Warner discusses lullabies, their function for both mother and child, and the numerous reasons so many traditional lullabies seem to be non child friendly, to modern ears Then, on to tricksters and mocking in story and traditional celebrations Fascinating, and a very readable scholarly book Also, there are bananas. So, hrm, slightly organized than From the Beast to the Blonde, but still mostly reads like I did some research on these sources, let s cram them all into a book somehow The section on fighting fear with humor, for example, was about Circe, giants, and bananas So, yeah. Fascinating study into fear and the way it s handled throughout history, in myriad forms The first two sections scaring and lulling are a little stronger than the third, making mock, but the whole thing is nonetheless fascinating.Re read as a writing reference. A non fiction book written by a fiction writer makes for a good read. This is a re read but confirms how much I love this far reaching compendium of the many ways we scare and soothe ourselves through our stories, songs, and lore The section on lullabies alone is worth the read An exhausting study of the psychological background of the Boogie Man and other mythical entities I cannot understand how such interesting characters can be made to seem so dull 3.5 stars in actuality, but I d rather veer on the 4 than the 3 because there is good stuff here, just you have to trawl through a lot to uncover it.Divided into 3 parts, bogeyman, lulling and making mock, the book studies the cultural history of monsters bogeymen based around our infantile primitive fears round food both hunger and the fear of being devoured consumed in the form of gross giants or cannibals Then sections 2 3 look at how we defang these fears through lull aby and taking the piss out of it I thought the Lull section was the most interesting, probably as Warner herself says, because it is the least studied of the 3 so provided fresh insights The bogeyman I found unfocused and overwhelmed by its research, I couldn t as so often with these type of books bringing in some many different styles of cultural artefact evidence really pick out the argument other than a repetition of the themes of giants, cannibalism and ogres Section 3 also seemed quite narrow and yet diffuse at the same time, with a whole chapter on the humble banana s role in humour and subversion, only undercut in times of actual shortage of the foodstuff, all of which I felt was both obvious could have been said in a paragraph not a whole chapter and somewhat stretching the point of mock And yet within this section was also a valuable slant into the difference between laughing at someone and laughing with them, when Warner points out that authorities fear and persecute parodists and satirists when the audience are laughing with the comics, rather than comedy that just picks on unfortunate people who the audience laughs at as other or victim or outsider.A mixed bag, but if you re dedicated there are some useful ideas revealed here. Why do we love being scared What purpose does the bogeyman serve in our societies This study of the bogeyman and other beasts who go bump in the night is fascinating, highly readable, and erudite.