❮Ebook❯ ➨ Fusiliers: Eight Years with the Redcoats in America Author Mark Urban – Golanvideoagency.info

Fusiliers: Eight Years with the Redcoats in America From Lexington Green In To Yorktown In , One Regiment Marched Thousands Of Miles And Fought A Dozen Battles To Uphold British Rule In America The Royal Welch Fusiliers With A Wealth Of Previously Unused Primary Accounts, Mark Urban Reveals The Inner Life Of The Regiment And, Through It, Of The British Army As A Whole As It Fought One Of The Pivotal Campaigns Of World History With His Customary Narrative Flair Urban Describes How British Troops Adopted New Tactics And Promoted New Leaders, And Shows How The Foundations Were Laid For The Redcoats Subsequent Performance Against Napoleon Fighting In The Climactic Battles Of The Revolution In The American South, The Fusiliers Became One Of The Crack Regiments Of The Army They Never Believed Themselves To Have Been DefeatedMark Urban S Bestseller Rifles Was An Account Of The Campaign Of A Brave Band Of Men Which Had Remained Untold For Too Long Bernard Cornwell Said Of It, If You Like Sharpe, Then This Book Is A Must, Whle For Frank McLynn In The Daily Express It Was Deeply Researched, Beautifully Crafted And Captivating Now That Searing And Completely Original Account Is Joined By Fusiliers, Sure To Delight All Readers Of The Best Military History And AdventureJacket Illustration Angus McBride 2009 05 Fusiliers The Saga of a British Redcoat Regiment in the American Revolution Author Mark Urban 400 pages 2008.I picked this book up at the library while I was actually looking for a different title The bulk of this book is devoted to chronicling the saga of the 23rd Infantry Regiment, The Royal Welch Fusiliers The saga of this unit provides a good example of the British Army in the American Revolution Parts of the unit were there at Lexington and Concord and the unit soldiered on through the main force engagements Bunker Hill, Siege of Boston, Refit in Nova Scotia, New York City of Long Island, Brooklyn Heights, Harlem Heights, White Plains, and Fort Washington , Danbury CT, Rhode Island, the Forage Battles in New Jersey, Brandywine, Germantown, Monmouth, Connecticut ports of New Haven, Norfolk, Greenfield, and Fairfield, Charleston SC, Camden SC, Guilford Courthouse, Yorktown Parts of the unit is the operative phrase The bulk of the unit soldiered on in most of the battles listed above without its grenadier and light infantry companies These elite units were off fighting separate from the main force I was aware of this concept from previous readings but the constant separation for the majority of the war did surprise me It is hard to think of the 23rd as a coherent unit given these forces separations The notion of coherence is further tested when you follow the saga of the unit s commanders and senior officers who were often detached from the unit preferring the sick bed, staying in England, getting a lucrative staff position, or just playing the system Command, control, patronage, and promotions in the 18th century British military system are baffling and strange to the modern reader Notions of meritocracy, education, or ability and the good of the unit come a distant second or worse to issues of class, cash, patronage and personal interest The scope of the book is focused almost exclusively on the unit and it people This may disappoint some readers who are looking for a rounded picture of the British Army and its toils and tribulations The author tells the story chronological telling concurrently the tales of the main unit, the detached units, the detached individuals and a very brief contextual positioning If you lack a than very basic grasp of the conflict you may read the book as an adventure tale with narrow tunnel vision If your knowledge is broader regarding the conflict or the 18thcentury modes of warfare you will understand of what is being related.The author has been accused of unneeded bias in his opinions or narration which weaves together the primary source and secondary source documents Understand that when understanding an action or incident second hand from a primary source that you are limited to what that person saw or experienced and this is usually about ten meters left and right and maybe 500 meters to the front Focusing in on one unit will narrow your vision and hence your statements if you have any affection for your topic Granted the author is a British patriot but objectivity or balance is not his goal, rather telling the story of those who acted is The reader will though gain a great appreciation for how this war and its causes affected those who were fighting in it Many of the 23rd s leaders were men of Whigish tendencies who had no desire beyond that of doing their duty to persecute the conflict their political sensibilities being allied to the Americans This was balanced out by the strong desire among some to apply the lessons learned in Scotland a few decades earlier These contradictions, this fighting in a conflict you may not support merely out of a sense of duty, was a very serious issue for the British Army in these campaigns It does make one think of the importance of loyalty to comrades and unit as opposed to nation or ideal.In the end you gain a sense that the British Army which left America for the most part in 1783 was an army very much akin to that American Army which left Vietnam in 1973 It felt itself un beaten, that though the war was lost the battles had been won That they had done their duty, even when that duty proved politically unpopular They seemed to have felt that the politicians limited their abilities They returned home to a public and to a military establishment which held them in no esteem and denigrated their experiences.This leads to probably the best part of the book, the experience of these men and units upon their return to England until well into the Napoleonic Wars The British Army relegated the American experience to the dustbin undoing much of what was gained The hard work and thought of making the uniforms and equipment soldier friendly, the tactics loose and initiative driven was removed from the main force and a tightened form of Fredrick the Greats Prussianism was instilled Eventually thanks to the likes of Cornwallis and others this would change and the hard learned lessons of the American Campaign would be allowed to permeate and affect the British leading them forward to victory From 1773 to 1783 about 1,250 men had been enumerated on the rolls of the 23rd serving in North America In 1783 the number of men on the rolls of the 23rd who were going back to England was 247 soldiers 193 men had deserted fully 15% of those who served The 23rd lost in combat 80 men and about 395 men to disease or other illness during the war It is said that the single greatest loss of soldiers was caused by the affections and attachments of soldiers and American women That the daughters of America removed far men from the rolls of the 23rd then the sons of liberty did is an interesting tale This is a good book, well written It has a narrowed focus and should not be viewed as a standalone text on the life and time of the British forces in the American Revolution but rather serve as a component of a greater whole. The story of the 23d Regiment of Foot in the American Revolution which, in some form or fashion, fought in almost every major engagement from Lexington and Concord to Yorktown obviously missing the Saratoga Campaign while in New Jersey with Howe I found this a neat complement to the Macksey book The War for America , in that is a much detailed and tactical discussion of an Army trying to fight a counterinsurgency given the instructions it received from its government subject of Macksey s book The British Army, in spite of its excellent reputation, was relatively inexperienced at the outset of the war, hobbled by some false assumptions and an inadequate organization It clearly adapted to its circumstances, and seemed to be close to extinguishing the rebellion on at least two occasions in 1776 and 1780 In fact, in a military sense, in spite of setbacks at Trenton and Saratoga and the French entry into the war, it appeared to some, in 1780 to be winning the war Arnold s defection, surrender of Charleston largest of war and what appeared to be a decisive victory at Camden And, of course, Yorktown doesn t really end the war the fall of the British government does For the British Army, its experience in America, while not transformational, certainly provided a significant milestone for the Army that will participate in the defeat of Napoleon. I enjoy Mark Urban s writing style, which is lively and vivid, but this book falls somewhere between being a history of the War of Independence, a history of the 23rd Regiment of Foot during the late 18th and early 19th Century, and an analysis of the evolution of British infantry tactics in the same period In the end, it doesn t do any of those things exhaustively and is therefore slightly disappointing.That being said, it is still an enjoyable and informative read One thing I appreciated was seeing how the 23rd changed from a sleepy regiment assigned to garrison duty, with all its boredom and frustration, to a lean, honed and deadly effective light infantry unit Common to warfare in all ages, this was due to a combination of leadership, tactics and experience As the war in America began, many of the officers and some of the men in the 23rd had seen action at Minden during the Seven Years War, but little had happened for them since In an era when a wealthy and well connected officer could aspire to a lieutenant colonelcy by the age of 25, most of the regimental officers of the 23rd were aging in their rank and deeply dissatisfied with their careers The men, on the other hand, had a smattering of Minden old hands but were mostly very young and totally lacking experience of active service That would all change when the revolutionary spirit in North America broke out into armed rebellion against the crown with the skirmishes at Lexington and Concord, and the subsequent battles at Bunker hill and Brandywine Creek Our view of the red coated British army is often coloured by its 19th Century incarnation, but it is mistaken to assume that the redcoats fighting in 1775 were any better trained than their Continental Army opponents, and were equally inexperienced.The high ranking leadership of the British army in America with the exception of Earl Cornwallis was indifferent and ponderous at best In particular, Howe s strategy was predicated on the misplaced assumption that threatening the rebels capital, Philadelphia, would produce a decisive battle and that taking it would provide a deadly blow to the prestige of the revolutionary leaders This proved to be wildly mistaken, and although he captured the city in September 1777, his failure to thereby smash the rebellion led to Howe s offensive petering out through the rest of 1777, and his recall by the end of the year following the debacle of Saratoga Experience and tactics were also important, as Howe relied heavily on his composite light and grenadier battalions and largely neglected his line regiments, who did not initially adopt the light infantry tactics that were suited to the broken ground on which North American battles were being fought Burgoyne s surrender at Saratoga proved to be a watershed moment, as it created a sense that change was imperative either a general peace or a new system of war.Following that, a new generation of younger officers led the regiment from 1778, who were willing to perform their duty with energy and diligence, and to lead their men from the front Interestingly, several of these younger officers had strong religious convictions, and there were also a few loyalist Americans among them The result of this was that the 23rd s cadre of officers serving in the field were younger mostly in their teens and twenties and were fortified by strong beliefs They were markedly different from the group of disappointed and disaffected middle aged men who had been leading the regiment in 1775 In Cornwallis, the southern army had an energetic, aggressive and intelligent general, and the experience borne out of years of campaigning along with suitable tactics comfortable clothing, looser infantry formations that were only 2 deep, and a system of fire and manoeuvre all contributed to the 23rd, and its sister regiments, being a much effective instrument of warfare At Camden a British army, far inland, defeated a far larger American enemy, a transformation made possible by having experienced troops, new tactics, and superior leadership at least at the local level.In the end, of course, Cornwallis had to surrender at Yorktown and the war was lost I think it s fair to say that this was due to the ineffective senior leadership of the British Army in North America and the changing political realities at home, rather than the battlefield tactics employed on the ground Clinton, headquartered in New York, was unable to grasp that the American desire for independence transcended the ability of the British to win on the battlefield, and that ultimately it was impossible to impose British rule with cannon and bayonet The distance from Britain, and the escalation of the war into a global conflict with the entry of France, Spain and Holland on the American side also meant that battlefield defeat was inevitable, whatever the tactics, experience and leadership the British could bring to bear.Following defeat in North America, most of the lessons learned were lost as the army adopted Prussian style infantry tactics with their emphasis on elaborate drill and complicated battlefield movements The ineffectiveness of these on an actual battlefield were demonstrated when the British army was embarrassed in the Low Countries in 1794, and finally when the Prussian army itself was shattered by the French At that point, the American veterans particularly Cornwallis and Harry Calvert were able to exert much influence and reintroduce the lessons learned on those North American battlefields 15 years before This was to lay the basis of the army that would eventually defeat Napoleon, perhaps the most effective army that Britain has ever fielded The epic victories of Wellington s army in the peninsula have long riveted British readers, but Urban amply demonstrates that an understanding of the carnage of Bunker Hill and the triumph at Camden is a vital prerequisite to understanding why the redcoat did so well against Napoleon s armies.It was also interesting to read a book on the War of Independence written from a British perspective It was certainly a bitter war, fought between neighbours, and was often ruthlessly and mercilessly prosecuted However, in reality most atrocities were carried out and terror imposed by the Patriot militias and the Committees of Public Security, while British troops were relatively restrained in how they interacted with the civilian population Since the war forms the foundation of the American national myth, it is difficult to separate the truth from the propaganda desire to portray the Redcoats as vicious devils and brutalised robots, marching on inept orders, and the patriots as idealistic freedom fighters American historians also tend to overestimate British military efficiency at the beginning of the war and underestimate it at the end.It is poignant to reflect on the similarities, from the British perspective, between the War of Independence and the recent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan The ability and duty placed on British soldiers to fight an unpopular war with dignity and honour are striking in both cases, and that is perhaps the most important lesson we can learn from the American War of Independence for today. Though ostensibly about the Royal Welch Fusiliers, Urban takes their narrative and spins a fantastic story about the entire military history of the American Revolution The 23rd was everywhere, from Lexington to Yorktown.Much of the book expounds on the inner feelings of the British soldiers and it reveals a very conflicted group It humanizes the Redcoat and helps soften the image he receives in film and television.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *